Amelia Rajecki vs Tegan Bush Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do the players compare in recent second-serve points win? Bush secures 36.09%, whereas Rajecki achieves 43.18%, suggesting Rajecki has a stronger second serve performance recently.
• Looking at the return game, Bush has won 53.36% of second-serve return points compared to Rajecki's 49.64%. Bush also excels in first serve returns, capturing 35.52% versus Rajecki's 26.02%.
• Examining resilience under pressure, Bush saves 42.73% of breakpoints, while Rajecki saves a higher 50.72%.
• Which player has a better performance record over the past year? Bush has won 58.82% of their matches, slightly edging Rajecki, who has secured 57.81%.
• Both players have their best results on Hard surfaces, with Bush at a 71% win rate and Rajecki at 58%.
• Analyzing match levels, Bush has a 58.82% win rate in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, whereas Rajecki records a win rate of 56.86% in similar events.
• In terms of opponent quality, Bush competes against players with an average rank of 401.41, while Rajecki's opponents rank slightly higher at 365.39.
• What about deciding sets? Bush excels here, winning 60% of deciding sets, compared to Rajecki's 45% over the past year.
• In breakpoint conversion, Bush has converted 37.35% of chances, marginally better than Rajecki's 36.22%, indicating efficiency in pivotal points.

Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):

Rajecki demonstrates a superior recent form on their second serve, an area significantly linked to predicting match winners. This gives Rajecki an edge in service games.

However, Bush shines when converting return opportunities and excels at first-serves return, possibly compensating for serve performance disparities.

Bush also displays resilience in deciding sets and slightly outperforms in breakpoint conversion. These areas are crucial in high-pressure situations and could turn the match dynamics in Bush's favor.

Considering all factors, Rajecki's current form on serve and breakpoint defense plays a significant role, but Bush's strengths in returns and crucial points resilience tip the balance slightly.

Based on these comparative insights, Bush is slightly more likely to win the upcoming match.